Buffalo Law Review

2017-2018 Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Joshua D. Mertzlufft
Executive Editor
Andrew B. Plewinski
Executive Publication Editors
Mary E. Aldridge Christian A. Cassara
John T. Murray Adelina E. Simpson
Managing Editor Head Note & Comment Editor Business Editor
Alexander D. Vilardo Martha M. Pigott Emma M. Savino
Note & Comment Editors Publications Editors Articles Editors
  • Brendan F. Conley
  • Ember K. Holmes
  • Nathan C. Woodard
  • Philip C. Barth IV
  • Christopher R. Bitar
  • Krystal C. Chapin
  • Chad A. Davenport
  • Nathan R. Fleming
  • Neal A. Johnson
  • Morgan A. Lloyd
  • Kelly E. Riley
  • Jacob R. Sikora
  • Emily Stoufer-Quinn
  • Laura Anne Godly
  • Rosa Guerrero
  • Joseph W. Schafer
  • Sebastian Sekhon

Associates
  • Michael E. Altman
  • Alexandra S. Balmer
  • Alexander C. Betschen
  • Katherine Blum
  • Richard P. Brooks
  • Alexander Buszka
  • Jacqueline A. Carosa
  • Christina Eaton
  • Alexandria N. Frainier
  • Gregory S. Gaglione, Jr.
  • Carolynn E. Grennell
  • Lindsey M. Johnson
  • Melissa J. Kathan
  • Colin M. Knoer
  • Stacy L. Kochanowski
  • Salvatore Licciardello
  • Ryan P. Maxwell
  • Chad B. Milbrandt
  • Lindsay K. Munschauer
  • Hillary E. Panek
  • Samantha R. Podlas
  • Genevieve S. Rados
  • Emilie E. Ronald
  • Alexandria Rowen
  • Molly F. Spakowski
  • Brendan C. Stone
  • Michael D. Szalach
  • Gabriela A. Tremont
  • Joshua S. Wallace
  • Nicholas D. Winkley
  • Jessi F. Woodward

Noteworthy

Paul Larkin's article on the implications of changing marijuana laws was featured in his testimony to the Canadian Parliament on the same subject matter. Paul had a particular focus on how, as governments are legalizing marijuana in different ways, and at different rates, there are coordination issues when citizens have freedom to travel between the jurisdictions of those governments. His full statement can be found here.

Brendan Conley's comment was selected from our 2016–17 Note & Comment competition. It focuses on the transient legal setting in which fantasy sports betting has been developing. Concurrent with its publishing, the Supreme Court made its decision in the case he follows. As expected, the Court ultimately did rule in favor of New Jersey on May 14, 2018, striking down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act in Murphy v. NCAA, 584 U.S. ___, Nos. 16-476, 16-477, 2017 WL 684747 (2018). More on Murphy can be found here.

[View more Noteworthy]

Copyright © 2018 Buffalo Law Review. All Rights Reserved.